What Shift Are You Looking To Create In Your Organization?

What Shift Are You Looking To Create In Your OrganizationWhen we work with clients to create and lead a Transformational Retreat, we begin with determining the goal. Leading a Transformational Retreat is a process that begins with clarifying a transformational goal with leadership. Sometimes, there are a number of ambitious goals, some of which can be accomplished or begun as a result of the retreat experience. We see the retreat as a focal point in a process that creates clarity and gathers and releases the energy and enthusiasm that will provide the momentum that supports the achievement of the other, larger goals, which may require new practices, processes and structures. Without this clarity and enthusiasm, adopting new ways of thinking and doing things can be so much more difficult.

Most industries and organizations are dealing with varying magnitudes of change. Yet, there continues to be evidence that most “change management” initiatives – as much as 70% – fail to achieve their objectives.

WHAT IF THE REASON “CHANGE MANAGEMENT” ISN’T SUCCESSFUL IS BECAUSE THE FOCUS IS TOO SMALL?
In nature, true change is transformative. It is lasting and there is no way to go back to the way it was. In organizations, many projects and programs are focused around tinkering at the edges. As a result, there are occasional alterations, but a dramatic shift in productivity, effectiveness or results is not common. Fundamental issues haven’t been addressed. In the end, people get frustrated because the change seems to be an interruption in getting their jobs done, is not meaningful to them, or doesn’t make sense. They don’t see a reason to let go of what is familiar.

In planning the Transformational Retreat, we work with leaders to create and engage their teams in an experiential process that is meaningful and important to them. Transformational change requires a clear, powerful vision and engaging people in solving the problem and creating the way forward. Engaging people to think and act in new ways can’t be accomplished by “broadcasting” what you want in a few memos, emails or meetings.

Anil worked recently with a client to implement a talent management program. The basis of it was to develop role profiles and competencies for each position in the organization. The notion of it was noble – develop a holistic approach to hiring, developing, promoting, succession planning, etc. On the face of it, no one could argue with it. Yet, no one really believed a shift would take place because it was seen as a bolt onto a system that was already broken. It was an addition onto a house that was already not laid out well. Larger cultural issues and practices were left unaddressed.

Incremental change to a system, process or organization that people see is not functioning well leads them to believe there will be no change. The answer is not to “tinker” around the edge but to blow it up and do something different.

That may not seem practical. Blow it up? How will work be done in the meantime? Transformational change doesn’t happen all at once. It is the culmination of a radically different vision that begins the transformation through generative conversations and relationships with everyone involved. The process and system are changed as a matter of course due to the shift in the way people think, talk and act.

As organizations continue to experience more disruptive change, we believe transformational leadership will replace “change management.”

The good news is, leaders don’t need all the answers. They can engage their people in creating the way forward.

Creating an intentional transformation requires an inquiry that leads to that powerful shift in context. It’s similar to the model we use to create a transformational retreat – a powerful tool you can use to launch a change in direction, focus, level of commitment, or other change. As we share in Leading the Transformational Retreat May 19 at 3 p.m. at Catalyst Ranch, we start by answering these questions:

WHAT’S THE URGENCY FOR THE TRANSFORMATION NOW?
Any great journey starts with the purpose. It is important to address the reason for transforming now:

  • Why is a shift needed?
  • Why now?
  • What happens if you do nothing?

There may be a change in the marketplace that impacts revenues or profitability, a shrinking customer base, new disruptive technology that forces a change, or a window of opportunity. Whatever the issue, the reason for a change needs to be big and compelling.

WHAT’S THE TRANSFORMATIONAL GOAL?
What is the ultimate goal of changing anyway? The reason can’t be just to get better or be “more nimble.” That is nibbling around the edges. It’s not clear enough; so will not result in transformation. Transformations are big shifts. Hone in on a goal that is the linchpin to all the upcoming big changes.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL?
What external or internal information or evidence is needed to support this intentional transformation? It starts with interviewing those people that are going to be impacted by the transformation. Uncover the gap between where the organization is now and where it wants to be in the future. It also is imperative to do some benchmarking against organizations that have reached the goal. They may or may not be in your industry but it is vital to get an understanding of their journey.

HOW DO YOU PREPARE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE CHANGE?
How you speak about it, the conversations you have and don’t have will impact what people hear and the result you can achieve. People resist change when they feel like it’s being done to them. Transformation happens when the people impacted have a voice, and experience being heard and involved. It is absolutely critical to ensure that those impacted by change not only buy in but are involved in developing and implementing the transformation. Successful transformation occurs when the people impacted by it understand that it’s coming, why and embrace it.

This blog was originally posted on Catalyst Ranch blog “Creative Juice” – http://blog.catalystranch.com/meet/using-a-highly-interactive-retreat-to-launch-a-transformation/

Change That Fails Before It Even Starts

change that fails before it even startsHave you ever worked on (or led) a project, and had an inkling that it was going to fail before you even started? Why? What is it about some change initiatives that fail miserably before they get to the starting gate?

What are the signals that your project is doomed, and what can you do to fix it?

If you find yourself looking back, saying something like:

“I knew going into this project that it just wasn’t going to work, we didn’t get real support or buy in.”

…You probably had things working against your from the get-go, and had you been able to recognize them, maybe things would have unfolded differently.

Here are a few sure fire signs your project is starting off on a broken foot:

1. THE PROJECT IS SPONSORED BY A GROUP OF PEER LEADERS

One of the worst things to hear for anyone leading a big change project is that there will be multiple “Project Sponsors.” As the primary leader that spearheads final decisions and helps to remove obstacles for the project, having more than one “sponsor” is a recipe for disaster. This adds layers of unnecessary complexity and bureaucracy to the project.

Much like the three headed dragon, there is not much good that can come from having more than one sponsor.

“Two people in charge means two opinions about what is most important.” – Ten Six Consulting

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT?

– Get commitment for ONE sponsor.

It may be easier said than done, but Project Sponsorship is a job for one. When a big change project is being chartered, it is critical to drive home that the sponsor should be the one leader that has the most at stake in the project’s success/failure. The project sponsor is the person that will help secure resources, make the final sign-off, and drive prioritizing. For large change initiatives, there is often one senior leader that fits that bill.

One company I worked with told me this story:

“In a recent project, three senior leaders within HR claimed to be sponsors of a talent management initiative. After two very unproductive meetings, we scheduled one more with the senior leaders and the Chief Human Resource Officer (CHRO). Each of the senior leaders discussed why they should be sponsors. We outlined why it was critical for one person to be the “single point of contact” regarding this project: they would need to be responsible for resources, budget, and prioritization. Within 15 minutes of the meeting’s kickoff, the CHRO decided she would be the best sponsor.”

Organizational change is hard enough without the added stress of multiple sponsors added to the mix. If all else fails, schedule time with the sponsors and the most senior person they all report to. Leverage the senior person to select the sponsor from the group. More often than not, that senior leader will end up being the sponsor to avoid showing favoritism, and to help increase the likelihood of project success.

2. THERE IS NO COMMITMENT FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE CORE PROJECT TEAM THAT THEY WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE INITIATIVE

How many times has a project charter been approved, only to fail because the resources selected to be part of the “core team” had neither the time to spend, nor the authority to make decisions?

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT?

– Lock in the project team OR get commitment that decisions made without them will be followed without protest

Yes, it sounds naive, but if a project is supposed to be high priority, then the proper resources should be assigned.

Recently, I was working with a client on a very large, time sensitive process/systems development initiative. My client worked hard to meet with each process owner. They all agreed that the project was a priority, but were not willing to dedicate resources to make it happen. The senior leader of the area demanded that the project be completed. In the end, we presented four alternatives to the group of business owners to determine how to go forward:

  • The project team would create the new processes and system flow with limited input from the business owners. The project team would use their internal organizational and industry knowledge to complete the design. They would present this to the business owners prior to going into development. There would be no need for resources from business owner teams, but they would have to live with the design that was implemented.
  • They could make resources available to work on the system and process design.
  • They could break the project up into two phases. Although the phases would require two rounds of testing and added development time, it would not tie up business owner resources
  • They could decide not to implement any process or systems changes.

In the end, the business owners selected #1 with some modifications. It was not optimal, but at least it kept the project moving in the right direction.

3. THE PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER INITIATIVE THAT HAS NO DIRECTION OR LEADERSHIP

There are many projects that fall under the umbrella of a larger initiative, like “Compliance” or “Integrated Talent Management.” Far too often, these overarching initiatives don’t have a leader that can help to connect projects together, or show synergy between projects.

A recent client was working on implementing an integrated talent management process and system. There were many projects that were part of making the system a reality. However, there was no designated leader to spearhead it. Therefore, every project that was supposed to be part of the larger initiative failed to articulate the benefits the same way, and business leaders were asked for their people’s time constantly. In very short order, people began to tune out requests for projects that were necessary for integrated talent management. They did not see the long-term benefits, and no one was articulating how the work contributed to the larger effort.

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT?

– If you are in a position to do so, offer to take on spearheading the larger initiative. It has often been said that leaders emerge when the need arises. Don’t let the fact that no one asked you to lead it stop you from trying. If there is no leader, why can’t it be you?

– Convince your boss that the project is not possible without a leader. A project that is part of a larger initiative, without someone spearheading that initiative, is a recipe for disaster. It’s more likely to get the proverbial cold shoulder than the time and energy it needs without a champion. If the leader of the larger initiative can’t be you, maybe your boss can take it on.

– Go to the senior leader of the group to designate a leader of the larger initiative. Make a pitch to the senior leader to take on being that “initiative leader.” It is likely they already have some sway in the organization, so they can put their political weight behind a project and remove obstacles quickly.

4. THE PROJECT COMES ON THE HEELS OF ANOTHER THAT FAILED

It is a common misconception that people suffer from “change fatigue.” That is, they don’t want to work on another change initiative because they are so overwhelmed by all the constant change. This concept is not really accurate.

People aren’t overwhelmed by change, they are tired of change that fails, is not fully implemented, or does not produce benefits. Unfortunately, once people go through a change initiative that fails, they are much more resistant to taking on more change. Sometimes, no matter how hard you try to sell the business benefits, it is not enough to sway their minds.

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT

– Slow the project down. Don’t try to go too quickly when implementing anything disruptive. Break the initiative into smaller phases to ease the change into existence.

– Start with more communication. Communicate much more about the business benefits and potential impacts of the project. Don’t try to sugar coat the downside of the project. People like to know that the change might cause temporary pain.

– Get intended users, or people impacted by the change, involved to gain their insight. This is known as the pull method of change. Make sure the people impacted by the change have a hand in the change’s design. This will increase the “buy in,” and create an end result that takes their issues into consideration.

5. THE POTENTIAL LAUNCH DATE COINCIDES WITH AN INITIATIVE THAT WILL IMPACT THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE

It is true that the only constant in business today is change, but too much change at one time (impacting a single group) is not productive. Organizations often launch a series of initiatives that impact the same people at the same time, but because these come from various business units, they are not always coordinated. This leads to a great deal of confusion, and can negatively impact the business.

One client of mine said:

“I worked with a financial services company that launched a number of changes/initiatives that impacted customer service agents every year at the same time. It wasn’t always intentional, but after delays and missed milestones, projects ended up getting pushed to the year’s end to be implemented. This coincided with the largest amount of work for the customer service agents. The result was frazzled customer service agents, leading directly to angry customers – definitely not a recipe for success.”

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT?

-CHANGE YOUR LAUNCH DATE!!!

Unless business cannot be conducted without the change, space out changes that impact one group too much. It’s just good change management!

Don’t let common “change killers” stop your change initiatives before they start.

What have you seen that stops change in your organization before it starts?

How To Keep Trainees Engaged

how to keep trainees engagedThere are a hundred theories about how to best design training. The question is how do we know that these trainings are going to stick long term? What truly makes training great?

While doing research for an upcoming book, I have been attending and monitoring a number of different types of training courses that are offered. What I have found, regardless of the topic of the instructor, is that the courses are created very similarly.

TRANSFER RATE
There is a particular rhythm in which all of us structural designers create courses. For the most part, training works fairly well. On the other hand, the long-term impact of the training is generally not seen within the organization.

This phenomenon is called transfer rate. It is and has been very poor for decades.

A couple of examples of this are:

  • Very few learners, as low as 5%, applied what they had learned in the workplace. -Tannenbaum and Yukl (1992)
  • There are low transfer rates from training ranging from 10% to 30%, with most on the low end. – Stolovich (2000)

One example that I remember clearly is an event that was recently conducted to help leaders explain a title change to their employees. This all-day training was chocked-full of reasons, rationale, exercises, and action plans. But, in the end these leaders felt like they didn’t have what they needed to be successful.

Why did the training fail?

There’s growing evidence that training for adults needs to follow some methodologies that may be counter to what many instructional designers, and learners, are accustomed to. Trainers need to start focusing on the four key elements listed below in order to truly give a good training.

1. MAKE IT SHORT:

Let’s face it; we have the attention span of a gnat. Our ability to concentrate on anything for an extended period of time is growing shorter and shorter.

There is a great deal of evidence that shows how were attention span and its longest is 5 to 7 minutes. What that tells us as instructional designers, is that we have to present our material in bite-size pieces changing topics, methods of delivery, exercises, and energy levels about every 10 minutes or so.

This is not an exact science, but the longer you go on training people on a single topic with no break, the sooner you will see people pull out their mobile devices and begin to check messages.

2. MAKE IT RELEVANT TO THE AUDIENCE:

This might sound too basic, but it is vital to keep all the information, examples, stories, exercises, tools, etc. relevant to the audience or participants.

If you don’t, it will not make sense.

A colleague of mine told me an example of what could happen when this strategy is not followed.

In a training conducted with the plants line supervisors, his trainer used an example about giving recognition in an office. He was referring to work that was done by someone after office hours, in an environment in which productivity and output were not measured as strangely as in the plant.

Immediately those supervisors lost interest in the class; they were turned off by the example and recognized that the person in front of them didn’t know who they were speaking to.
This is a reminder that it is vital to keep the audience engaged in order to conduct a good training.

3. GIVE THEM SOMETHING TO TAKE AWAY:

Employees use their computers, tablets, and phones almost exclusively now. Providing a gigantic binder of materials or each slide that is presented during the class is a complete waste of time and paper.

No one will use it, except maybe for a door stop.

However, it is a good idea to have something that summarizes the learning and gives the participants a template to practice what they have heard. Using the information will be where the real learning takes place.

4. GIVE THEM A WAY TO FOLLOW UP:

Since using the lessons is where the real learning takes place, building in a follow up mechanism to gauge learning, elicit questions, and provide additional coaching is vital.

There are hundreds of ways to do this; LinkedIn, Facebook, a company’s intranet, etc. Building a time and method for someone to follow up after a training is absolutely critical.

The other part of follow up is to involve the manager/leader of the participant. If the manager/leader is not encouraging, as well as demanding, then the usage of the learning will fall by the wayside.

In the research for my upcoming book, SIMPLE, these are a few of the most important aspects of creating great training that actually works. Developing training that lasts days and leaves the participants with a huge binder does not work anymore, but neither does an e-learning course that just throws information at the participant with no action afterward.

There is a balance that leverages the latest brain research and the best of adult learning theory to develop training that makes an impact on performance.

That is what we all want, isn’t it?

What have you found that doesn’t work about the way training is developed or delivered? What are some best practices that you have seen work well? I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Image Sources: cardinalpath.com

The Not So High Impact Of Competencies

The Not So High Impact Of CompetenciesCompetencies are one the most studied and research tools in organization development and design. Yet, there is no reported link to increases in performance based on or due to them. It seems like many organizations put them in place to encourage a missing or desired behavior.

How many times do they follow up or actually measure if the competencies are making an impact?

Could it be that developing and implementing competencies is an example of Organizational Learned Helplessness?

COMPETENCY?

Competence, or competency, is the ability of an individual to do a job properly.

A competency is a set of defined behaviors that provide a structured guide enabling the identification, evaluation and development of the behaviors in individual employees.

In its purest form, “These competencies are always displayed by superior performers.”

For years, possibly decades, organizations have spent hundreds of millions of dollars creating competencies and subsequent training to drive employees to meet or emulate those competencies with little or no real impact to the success or failure of the organization.

After a 13 month development project, one of the credit card companies in the world rolled out new leadership competencies to their service leaders. Twelve months later, there were a series of incidents caused by those service leaders that brought the company to its highest level of customer loss.

Was that all due to competencies?

Of course it wasn’t. However, after millions of dollars spent on their development and roll out, the competencies did little, if anything, to impact the actual performance of the targeted leaders.

There are literally hundreds of examples of competency programs failing to correct lasting cultural issues or performance problems.

Although designed with the best intentions, competency models have a tendency to have inherent flaws that stop them from being as effective as they could be.

COMPETENCIES ARE INHERENTLY SUBJECTIVE

Even with all the hard work that goes into defining each competency, in the end the rating, or a level of competence, for each “attribute” is based on the subjective interpretation of the evaluator regardless of the position.

Because a competency cannot be defined down to the “gnat’s eye lash detail,” it is inherently generic. It cannot cover every aspect or need of a potential role.

This leads to interpretation by the person using the competency.

COMPETENCIES ARE NOT GENERALLY PRACTICAL

Everyone wants to hire and work with top performers. Generally top performers possess the competencies described in most models.

But having these doesn’t mean the person will be successful in doing the actual work required with the resources available, working for the assigned leader and his/her unique style, and working in the company’s unique culture with all of the associated pressures, systems, procedures, and personalities.

COMPETENCY MODELS ARE CONFUSING

Generally, there are too many competencies in most competency models.

Researchers found that there are generally 5 to 7 key “attributes” that can predict future success and a role. However, competency models often have double or triple those numbers of “attributes”.

Discussing and managing that number of “attributes” is nearly impossible.

COMPETENCY TRAINING PROGRAMS ARE A “HODGEPODGE” OF COURSES AND TOOLS

Training associated to each competency, or level within a competency, is a compilation of training courses, webinars, books, and tools that are loosely related to the competency.

The training doesn’t necessarily impact the performance of the individual, and, unfortunately, as with most training there is little follow-up from the manager to determine whether or not the training actually had the intended impact.

What to do?

Although there is no amount of evidence that shows that competency models improve the performance of an organization, they do provide a valuable service. Competencies act to standardize the characteristics of what success might look like in a given role.

That is important when looking to fill a job or to evaluate performances.

On the other hand, there is an easier way to get to the same core group of important skills that is easier and much less expensive.

In a recent blog by Rob Benson:

  • Consider bagging the full-blown competency development process; do a simple brainstorming process instead. Brainstorm and list the skill sets that are needed for each job, not the individual competencies.

For most jobs, I guess that you would end up with a fairly short list. In our particular industry, this list might involve presentation skills, coaching skills, sales skills, instructional design skills, planning/organization skills, and one or two others.

  • Share that list with everyone whom it applies
  • Identify a superior performer for each skill set. Again, this is easier done than most realize. An anonymous, one-question survey, “who has great people skills in this department?” would do the trick.
  • In an ideal world, assign the superior performer to the employee seeking development.

Have them mutually agree upon objectives, benchmarks, and time frames. Then, provide that as a less-than-one-page-document to the manager of the employee seeking development.

  • Follow up with both. Expect the short report at the agreed-upon date noting key activities undertaken, lessons learned, challenges experienced, and next steps for continued development.

No, it is not as attractive as a 13 month project that captures the attributes or characteristics of the most successful person in a designated role, but it does identify critical skills and leverage the internal experts to mentor others.

This may not be practical for an organization wide approach. But, if there is a need to create competency models for standard roles, consider using an off the shelf tool that has defined competencies and roles already loaded in it. This will shorten the development time, meet over 85% of the need, and it is based on verified research.

After millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of hours spent on implementing competencies, has there been any real impact in organizational performance? What do you think? Are competencies necessary? If so, why? Are there causal links to organizational performance? Where have you seen competencies be successful? How about unsuccessful?

Image Sources: jan.ocregister.com

Move From Talk To Action

move from talk to actionTalk is cheap.

We can prattle away about a problem until we’re red in the face, but unless real steps are taken, nothing ever gets accomplished.

In fact, there’s such a disparity between talk and action, most people are familiar with figures of speech like “all talk and no action” or “talk the talk vs. walk the walk.”

It’s such a common problem, it seems like we don’t even think twice about a strategy that never quite gets put in motion, about New Year’s resolutions that slip through the cracks, about making plans with friends that don’t ever come to fruition.

  • People talk about losing weight but never go to the gym.
  • They talk about continuing education but never enroll.
  • Our daily experiences indicate that talking about something we want to do (or would like to see done), but not following through with action is pretty par for the course.

It’s ridiculous! Are we just deluding ourselves? Is talking about a plan a way to make ourselves feel better, to gain a sense of accomplishment without actually accomplishing anything?

PLANNING TO PLAN

Now, there is plenty of value in planning. Talking at length about a project or goal before diving in can prevent a lot of problems. There is absolutely nothing wrong with diligent and thorough preparation. However, if planning is as far as the process gets, what’s the point?

Taking action is the hard part, but it’s also the only way to see real results. In the business world, implementing a new policy or making a significant change to company processes is a massive undertaking – but it has to start somewhere. Leaders need to be willing to wade through the trenches to get things moving.

This is a lesson that goes far beyond corporate change, though. This applies to every aspect of our lives! Change can only come through action – and it takes motivation to step out of our comfort zones.

We need to become dissatisfied with talk, or rather, we need to recognize it for what it is: the first step in the process, but a single component of the development of positive change.

So, how do we get from the planning stage to the action stage?

The same methods work on both the individual and company-wide level, so whatever changes you’d like to see, here are a few ways to get in motion:

GRAB AHOLD OF THE PRESENT

Ask yourself, “What can I do to make progress right now?” Even one small action can be enough to kick start a whole process. If you have the time to think about something you want to get done, you have time to start doing it!

Action in the present moment helps reduce some of the anxiety brought on by large, multi-phase plans or overwhelming projects. Get one small thing accomplished and move on the next.

GET INSPIRED

In most situations, planning arises out of real desire – you only start planning something because you truly want to see it happen. Instead of getting bogged down in the details of the plan, though, keep that hunger alive in the front of your mind.

If you truly want to see something accomplished, let the desire burn you up inside! The more actively you’re thinking about the outcome, or the problem you need to solve (instead of the arduous process to getting there), the more taking action will start to feel like a necessity. You won’t be able to help moving forward.

MAKE A CHOICE

You don’t actually have to do anything. You could sit perfectly still every minute of every day. You do, however, make conscious choices to do all of the things you do in a given day, so why not add something new to the list?

Get rid of the feelings of obligation that take away your sense of control. Do things because you want to, because you choose to, because the end result is something you actively want to make happen.

Become the master of your own actions!

Action takes courage and motivation, but it is by no means impossible. In fact, taking action is habit forming! It only takes one step in the right direction to start manifesting the improvements you want to see, and once you start, there’s no turning back.

Picture thanks to http://mountainbreezedevotions.blogspot.com/2008/03/talk-is-cheap.html

How Do I Make My Team More Productive?

how do i make my team more productiveThat’s really the wrong question. Just like the old saying, “you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink” there is really no way of truly making others on the team more effective. Yes, you can make systems better. They can cut out steps and make it easier to do a task or job.

But the truth is – The only person that you really have control over being more effective is you.

The real question is – How do I be an even more effective manager?

In 2004, CLC did a study to understand what really drives engagement. After surveying 50,000 people they found 50 key drivers and broke them down into six categories:

  • Company culture and recognition
  • New starter/new role training
  • Personal and career development
  • Quality of the senior executive team
  • Manager behaviors

Manager behaviors was the overwhelming driver of engagement. It accounted for 72% of the levers of employee commitment and engagement.

But engagement alone does not make performance great. Results and productivity are what matters, right? Well, managers have an impact there too.

“A recent study from Stanford University demonstrated that replacing a poor manager with high-performing manager increases a team’s productivity by 12%. In contrast, adding a new employee to that team only increases productivity by 11%, and at much greater expense.”

Just by being a better manager, a team’s performance can be increased with the same number of team members!

The answer to the question “ how do I make my team more productive?”

Be a better manager.

It’d be great to hear your thoughts on this topic. Contact me using the form below.

Picture thanks to http://ascendteaminc.com/ascend-team-inc-talks-about-five-things-productive-people-do-regularly/

Why Meetings Fail You

why meetings failAt a recent client project, we had a regular Tuesday status update meeting. It was the longest hour of the entire day. The reason: It is invariably turns into something out of twilight zone.

Most of the updates turned into monologues about either why something isn’t working or tangents on completely subjects that had nothing to do with the project.

Although meetings are really the only way to keep everyone on the same page and talking to each other they have to be time well spent.

To add insult to injury, most meetings are not just non-productive, but a downright waste of your employees time. – Craig Jarrow is the author of Time Management Ninja.

Amazingly, it is nothing earth shattering that makes meetings productive. There are two things that you can do as a leader to make sure the meetings are more productive.

COME PREPARED

“Having no agenda is the first sign your meeting will be a time-suck.” – Penelope Trunk

Make sure that there is an agenda and an expectation that everyone comes prepared. That means updates need to brought, presentations ready, etc. If you aren’t ready or prepped, you don’t get your turn. Outside of extenuating circumstances, there should be no exceptions to this regardless of level in organization.

THIS GAME NEEDS A REF

The referee is at the heart of every football match, creating a fair and safe environment so that everyone can enjoy playing.

Second, make sure that every meeting has a facilitator (ref) that holds people accountable sticking to times and enables the conversation to flow. This person could be the meeting owner or a participant. Their primary role is to ensure that the agreed agenda is followed and when there are deviations (which there will be) they are agreed upon and understood by the people in the meeting.

Yes there are a thousand other little things you could and should do for a productive meeting. But these two tricks will go a long way.

What ideas do you use to make meetings great? Want more great ideas, let me know.

Picture thanks to http://blog.pgi.com/2012/08/7-warning-signs-of-a-bad-meeting/

The Difference Between Training and Transformation

difference between training and transformationAll jobs require training, but if you really want principles to stand the test of time, if you want big changes to stick, training isn’t enough – you need transformation.

SO, WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?

At the most basic level, training is about skills and transformation is about mindset. Put another way, training changes how you do something, transformation changes how you think about something.

Transformation is important because it’s bigger than training. It sets the stage for effective, retainable training in any skill – because if the transformation has happened effectively, the person receiving the training will already understand the key concepts and principles to be looking for, they will understand the big-picture importance of why they are being trained for a certain task, and most importantly, they will seek out the fine details of the training because it is important to them on a personal level.

Transformation comes through engagement and transparency, and through an inclusive approach to new responsibilities, skills, and job roles. It needs to be perfectly clear, with well-supported reasons, just why the training is happening in the first place.

The transformation happens when an individual adopts a viewpoint larger than the task at hand. The transformed individual not only understands why a change needs to happen, but also becomes a driving force to see it through.

It is this emotional component that makes transformation so important – and so effective. It’s not enough to just tell an employee or new hire that a certain practice or policy needs to be adopted – to really sink in and become part of regular operation, they have to understand why it needs to happen, and more so, agree with the reasoning behind it.

Training is certainly important, but transformation comes first for big changes. Even if there’s no actual training involved, getting people on the same page mentally and emotionally sets up a team for success – expectations are clear, motivation and incentive are clear, and if nothing else, everyone knows exactly what they’re getting into, for better or worse.

Training can change and be updated – it can even be forgotten or replaced. Transformation, though, tends to stick for the long-term.

Are you training your employees, or transforming them?

Picture thanks to http://meetville.com/quotes/author/john-p-kotter/page1

How A Transformational Leadership Retreat Inspires Action

transformational leadership retreatWhat shift are you looking to create in your organization?

When we create and lead a Transformational Leadership Retreat, we begin with determining the goal.

The process begins with working closely with leadership to clarify a transformational goal. There may be a number of ambitious goals, some of which can be accomplished (or at least begun) as a result of the retreat experience.

We see the retreat as a focal point in a process for creating clarity. The experience gathers and releases energy and enthusiasm, providing the momentum needed to achieve other, larger goals that may require new practices, processes, and structures.

Without this clarity – and the accompanying enthusiasm – adopting new ways of thinking and doing things can be much more difficult.

Most industries and organizations are dealing with varying magnitudes of change, yet there continues to be evidence that most “change management” initiatives – as much as 70% – fail to achieve their objectives.

What if the reason “change management” isn’t successful is because the focus is too small?

In nature, true change is transformative – there is no way to go back to the way it once was. In organizations, many projects and programs are focused on tinkering with change at the edges. As a result, there are occasional alterations, but a dramatic shift in productivity, effectiveness, or results remains uncommon because fundamental issues haven’t been addressed.

In the end, people get frustrated because the change seems to be an obstacle to getting their jobs done, is not meaningful to them, or doesn’t make sense.

In planning Transformational Retreats, we work with leaders to engage teams in an experiential process that is meaningful to them. Transformational change requires a clear, powerful vision from the get go, as well as methods of engaging people in solving problems and creating a way forward.

Engaging people to think and act in new ways simply can’t be accomplished by “broadcasting” what you want in a few memos, emails, or meetings.

As an example, we recently worked with a client to implement a talent management program. The purpose was to develop role profiles and competencies for each position in the organization. The notion was noble: develop a holistic approach to hiring, developing, promoting, succession planning, etc.

At face value, no one could argue with it, yet no one really believed a shift would take place, largely because it was seen a “bolt on” fix to a process that was already broken.

Incremental change to a system, process, or organization that is not functioning well leads people to believe there will be no change at all. The solution is not to “tinker” around the edge, but to destroy the broken system and build something different.

That may not seem practical. Blow it up? How will work be done in the meantime?

Transformational change doesn’t happen all at once. It is the culmination of a radically different vision, beginning with generative conversations and relationships for everyone involved. The process and system are changed as a matter of course, due to the shift in the way people think, talk, and act.

As organizations continue to experience more disruptive change, we believe transformational leadership will replace “change management.”

The good news is that leaders don’t need all the answers. They can engage their people to create the way forward.

Creating an intentional transformation requires an inquiry that leads to a powerful shift in context. It’s similar to the model we use to create a transformational retreat – a powerful tool you can use to launch a change in direction, focus, level of commitment, etc. Start by answering these questions:

WHAT’S THE URGENCY FOR THE TRANSFORMATION NOW?

Any great journey starts with the purpose. It is important to address the reason for transforming now:

  • Why is a shift needed?
  • Why now?
  • What happens if you do nothing?

There may be a change in the marketplace that impacts revenues or profitability, a shrinking customer base, new disruptive technology that forces a change, or a window of opportunity you can’t pass up. Whatever the issue, the reason for a change needs to be big and compelling.

WHAT’S THE TRANSFORMATIONAL GOAL?

What is the ultimate goal of changing anyway? The reason can’t be just to get better or be “more nimble.” That is nibbling around the edges. It’s not clear enough, and therefore won’t result in transformation. Focus on a goal that is the linchpin for all of the upcoming changes.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL?

What information or evidence (internal or external) is needed to support this intentional transformation? Finding the answer starts with interviewing people that are will be impacted by the transformation. Uncover the gap between where the organization is now and where it wants to be in the future.

It also is imperative to do some benchmarking against organizations that have reached the goal. They may or may not be in your industry, but it is vital to get an understanding of their journey.

HOW DO YOU PREPARE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE CHANGE?

How you speak about the proposed change, the conversations you have (and don’t have), will impact the result you can achieve. People resist change when they feel like it’s being done to them.

Transformation happens when the people impacted have a voice and feel involved. It is absolutely critical that those impacted by change not only buy in, but are also involved in developing and implementing the transformation. Successful transformation occurs when the people embrace it, understanding why – and when – the change is.

Anil Saxena and Jackie Sloane work together to create transformational interventions and retreats for public sector, Fortune 1000, privately held, and not-for-profit entities.

Questions about learning more about this topic, transformational retreats, or transformational change? Want to schedule a transformational retreat for your organization at the Catalyst Ranch? Contact Jackie Sloane, Jackie@sloanecommunications.com, at 773-465-5906 or Anil Saxena, anil@cube214.com, at 847-212-0701 to learn more.

Picture thanks to http://mkalty.org/change-quotes-2/

Leadership Follies – Don’t Call It A Program

leadership folliesWhat’s the best way to make sure leadership development, employee engagement, or any other people initiative will fail?

Call it a program.

Programs are to employees with kryptonite is to Superman. They scream of formalized, over complicated initiatives that may or may not apply to the goals of the group, but must be followed to the letter. Things that are engrained in the culture aren’t called programs…they just happen.

Can you imagine (fill in the blank holiday) dinner at Mom’s being a program. No!

WHAT CAN YOU DO TO MAKE SURE THAT EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DOESN’T TURN INTO ANOTHER PROGRAM:

LINK ENGAGEMENT TO BUSINESS OUTCOMES

It is vital that employee engagement (or any people program) be linked DIRECTLY to a business or organizational goal Without that link, the idea of working on engagement will be akin to using the ab master that was bought at 2:30AM when watching an infomercial. It sounds like a great idea. Heck, it even has some science and data behind it. But no link to business goals = no long term engagement

MAKE ENGAGEMENT PART OF THE CONVERSATION ALL THE TIME

Look for any opportunity to discuss engagement or maybe (gasp) to engage people. Engagement should be at the forefront of senior leadership communication, part of the objective of every management training and the driving force of every new initiative regarding employees. Engagement once or twice a year is similar to the new year’s resolution phenomenon.

“A New Year’s Resolution is something that goes in one year and comes out the other” – Oscar Wilde.

Don’t fall into that trap.

MAKE ENGAGEMENT EASY

Employee Engagement the program is a long hard slog. It starts with a survey that takes too long to fill out. Then there are reports and data that are hard to decipher and take months (and months) to see. Finally, there is some grandiose action that is to be taken based on said results that is supposed to target the “area of opportunity”. In between there is a little training for managers and a lot of hand wringing to get people to take surveys and turn in action plans. Why can’t engagement be easy?

  • Keep the survey short
  • Don’t have more than 20 questions. Large unfocused surveys make people believe the organization doesn’t really know what its asking for. Also, questions that are targeted on what is actionable by managers makes engagement real for everyone
  • Get data back to managers and teams within a month or less from the time a survey is taken.
  • Long periods of time between surveys doesn’t bode well for action. It also makes people think there is something to hide. Turn data around quickly to start the conversation
  • Give managers constant training
  • Set up training on a regular basis that managers can access new insight or tools about engagement regularly. Also, provide a forum for them to share ideas with each other.
  • Make action plans living
  • Put action plans into a system that can be updated and is easily accessible. Don’t put a lot of restrictions on them either. Let teams do what they think is best.
  • Take action at the organizational level right away
  • Use aggregate data to put new programs or enhance programs right away and link it to engagement. Its important for folks to see results right away.

What else can be done to shift employee engagement from a program? How can we make sure that it doesn’t turn into “have to”?

Picture thanks to http://www.drugrehabfl.net/2014/02/25/our-drug-rehabilitation-program-gives-you-tips-on-saying-no/

FIND A SOLUTION

Cube 2.14 will increase your organizational effectiveness. We specialize in developing innovative, practical solutions to create productive workplaces that exceed goals.